“God Is Real”: Chris Pratt Delivers 9 Mic-Drop Life Lessons After Winning Generation Award

Actor Chris Pratt just took home the’ Generation Award’ at the MTV Movie and TV Awards this weekend, but it’s his advice , not the accolade, that has the Internet buzzing.

Interspersed with inspiration, Godly wisdom, and a little humor, the actor delivered what he called “9 Rules from Chris Pratt, Generation Award Winner.”

Amidst some hysterical the recommendations on how to appropriately poop at parties, Pratt also made sure to point to God in several of his life-lesson rules( especially, numbers 6, 8, and 9 ), and it would be wise for the next generation to take heed.

“God is real. God loves you. God wants the best for you. Belief that. I do, ” charged Pratt, before also fostering spectators to pray and rest their flaws in God’s perfect grace 😛 TAGEND

“Nobody is perfect. People are gonna tell you you’re perfect merely the way you are. You’re not. You are imperfect. You always will be, but there is a powerful force-out that designed you that route, and if you’re willing to accept that, you will have grace. And grace is a gift, and like the freedom of the media we enjoy in this country, that grace was paid for with somebody else’s blood. Do not forget it. Don’t take it for granted. God bless you.”

Listen to Chris Pratt’s inspirational “9 Rules” speech in full below :

Chris Pratt Wins the Generation Award at MTV Movie& Tv Awards

Listen up! Generation Award win Chris Pratt has nine rules to life you need to hear.

Watch more of the 2018 Movie& TV Awardings at mtvawards.mtv.com!

Posted by MTV on Monday, June 18, 2018

Read more: https :// faithit.com/ chris-pratt-9-rules-generation-award-winner /

Trumps Negotiating Style Is Pure Art of the Moron

I’m often on the receiving objective of the Trumpentariat’s criticisms of Never Trump conservatives.

Don’t I get it? Don’t I adoration how Trump is achieving the impossible, and soaring to statures to which no other president could aspire? Haven’t I get over national elections yet? When, oh when, will I finally MAGA? I received an email Tuesday from a Trump fan asking why for once I couldn’t congratulate Donald Trump for his work with North Korea.

Leaving aside my usual critiques of Trump, which are, as you may have noticed, colorful, varied, and pointed, let’s give the president a fair assessment of his week’s activities, and thanks and credit where thanks and credit are due.

Of course, “were starting” when Trump fled the humid confines of Washington , D.C ., jetting to Quebec to blow up the G7 summit and take a massive political and rhetorical dump on some of our longest-standing and closest friends. But I’m playing nice, so thank you, Mr. President, for adopting 19 th-century trade policies that blend both raging economic illiteracy and unavoidably adverse outcomes for America. Well done.

Thank you, because nothing mentions Presidential Stature like your juvenile dick-waving and insults attacking the heads of government of the G7 commonwealths. Thanks are also in order for deploying your clown-car motorcade of loudmouth, shock-jock aides to attain the damage worse.

Great work taking guidance from the Home Office in Moscow; you invested more hour at the G7 summit doing Vladimir Putin’s bidding than you did strengthening the ties between the United States and our closest friends.

Even so, I’m supposed to thank the president, right? Well, thank you, Donald. You mailed a message to our allies in Asia and beyond that you’re willing to compromise their security and ours for an inconsequential photo-op with a hopped-up fatboy dictator who looks like Pyongyang already has a Krispy Kreme and a Popeyes, and he’s the only one allowed to eat in them.

Russia, Iran, Syria, and other bad actors want to thank you, Mr. President. You sent the clearest of signals that sanctions regimes, inspections, and verified denuclearization are no longer relevant in our brave new age of nationalist populist strongmen and Michael Bay knockoff videos.

Evidently, all the bad guys have to do is kiss your ample ass long enough and shower you with enough superficial kudo and they can play you like the trifling intellectual lightweight you most certainly are. So, thank you for that reminder.

Nobel Prizes may have been dancing in your brain on your way to Singapore, and perhaps the Nobel Committee will fire up the forge and cast you an extra super-glitzy giant prize, out of gratitude. Perhaps the award will make up for the fact Kim Jong Un took away every single thing he wanted from this meeting, including the propaganda takeover of all propaganda coups.

Ever wonder what the consequences of legitimizing a nuclear-armed loony who has used chemical weapons on his own family, starved his people, and shall include participation in systematic mass murder to retain power might be? Congratulation! You’re about to find out. Us too.

Evidently, the aim of the trip was to produce a communique so shallow, meaningless, and ephemeral that its contents were a combination of already-broken DPRK agreements and back-of-the-envelope wishcasting. Our South Korean allies may seem freaked out, but it’s just their lane of appreciating you.

Well done, Mr. President. You got your on-camera handshake with a humankind who orders the deaths of children. You got your lunch with one of the few remaining dictators on this earth and set the Leader of the Free World on these levels as a hereditary thug who killed his half-brother with chemical weapons.

Good job, Mr. President. You’ve terrified our allies with your cavalier and sloppy art-of-the-moron negotiating style. You’ve told American troops who will remain on the Korean Peninsula they’re no longer going to practice with their Korean equivalents as a discouraging to the North’s long, long history of aggression. I’m sure if the balloon goes up, they’ll thank you for stopping their exercises.

Mission accomplished, Mr. President. You’ve determined your devotees up for a spectacular comedown when North Korea does what it always does. Right now, they’re cheering themselves hoarse, dancing in the street, and belief to the bottom of their deplorable little hearts that you’ve denuclearized North Korea, brought Kim to heel, undo the cruelties done in the Hermit Kingdom for generations, and started building Trump Tower Pyongyang.

Hats off to you, Mr. President. You’ve cut the sinews of a strategic confederation with Japan and South Korea that has contained North Korea, and maintained a brake on Chinese power in the Western Pacific.

Thank you, Mr. President, for reminding us that Kim Jong Un is talented. I couldn’t is all very well. He’s talented at killing his uncles, half-brothers, cousins, and countrymen with poison, anti-aircraft firearms, chemical weapons, and flamethrowers. He’s talented at depriving his people, systematically reducing their life expectancy, health, and even height because of the chronic malnutrition his evil policies entail. He’s talented like “his fathers” and grandpa before him at rooking Western leaders. They’re talented at proposing deals they never had the slightest intent of keeping.

Heckuva job, Mr. President. No matter what a weapons-grade dumpster fire this week generated, you’re safe from congressional oversight, but you know that by now. Nothing you do matters to this Congress. No is important that damage you impose on our economy, our confederations, trade, our stature in the world, our role as an exemplar of democratic values, our ability to serve as an honest broker in the international community, and our security, Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell will lay supine before you.( Supine is that post you typically have to pay for, hoss .)

Their evident, constant terror at running afoul of your volcanic mood, lunatic adherents, and media cheer squad mutes their tongues and stays their hands even when they should know better. They should panic a world where America is isolated, mistrusted, and weaker economically, morally, and politically. They should worry the acid dripping of your rhetorical and moral poison reduces American power and influence.

Instead, they fear their own chairwoman, hiding behind furrowed foreheads and elliptical, mealymouthed express of grave concern.

So congratulations, Mr. President. You expended the week purposely wrecking American alliances and leadership, allied yourself with one of the most egregious foes of liberty in the world, and abandoned the shared values of our friends like Canada, France, the United kingdom government, Japan, and Germany.

You must be so proud.

Read more: https :// www.thedailybeast.com/ trumps-negotiating-style-is-pure-art-of-the-moron

James Corden sings emotional Carpool Karaoke duets with Paul McCartney\n

Imagine singing an emotional duet to “Let It Be” in the car with the man who wrote it.

That little pail listing item was ticked by James Corden, who fell the full instalment of “Carpool Karaoke” featuring legendary Beatle Paul McCartney on Thursday night’s The Late Late Show .

A jolly good athletic who genuinely looks like he had the best hour, McCartney operates through some of his most iconic numbers, from the thematically necessary “Drive My Car, ” to “Penny Lane, ” and the first song he ever wrote at 14. Oh, and a little song called “Let It Be.”

Corden takes McCartney on a little trip down memory lane around Liverpool in the episode, including a visit to the legend’s former childhood home, and of course, Penny Lane, and it all ends in a local tavern with the pair singing “Hey Jude, ” to some astounded locals.

What a legend.

Read more: https :// mashable.com/ 2018/06/ 22/ paul-mccartney-carpool-karaoke /~ ATAGEND

Bottle feeding is a woman’s right, midwives told

Image copyright Science Photo Library

If a woman decides not to breastfeed her babe it is her selection and must be respected, midwives are being told.

The Royal College of Midwives’ new position statement attains it explicitly clear that girls should be supported if, after being given advice, information and supporting, they opt to bottle feed applying formula milk.

Although breast is best, often some girls struggle to start or maintain breastfeeding, says the RCM.

Informed choice must be promoted.

The National Childbirth Trust says females can experience unacceptable levels of pressure nonetheless they feed their children – from family and friends, as well as from people they barely know.

37 Inventions Perfect For Lazy (or Just Really Efficient) People

There are only 24 hours in a day. You have to spend some of them sleeping and some of them working, but the rest can be spent in whatever way you think is best. When it comes to certain tasks, they’re just not worth the time they take up when you do them the usual way. So, we’ve found some products to help you build some shortcuts into your life. Some may call it lazy; we prefer to call it efficient.

We hope you find these products as awesome as we do. Just an FYI: 22Words is a participant in the Amazon affiliate program and may receive a share of sales from links on this page.


Read more: http://twentytwowords.com/37-inventions-perfect-for-lazy-or-just-really-efficient-people/

The Collapse of a $40 Million Nutrition Science Crusade

On Monday night Gary Taubes will board his second transatlantic flight in a week–from Zurich to Aspen–then eventually back to Oakland, where he calls home. The crusading science columnist best known for his beef with Big Sugar is beat after four periods of nutrition seminar glad-handing. But there’s no rest for the down and out. Taubes is on a desperate money-raising mission for the Nutrition Science Initiative–his nonprofit dedicated to improving the qualifications of nutrition research.

NuSI( pronounced new-see ) launched in September 2012 with much fanfare, including in the pages of WIRED. It promptly raised more than $40 million from big-name donors to facilitate expensive, high-risk analyzes intended to illuminate the root of obesity. Taubes and his cofounder, physician-researcher Peter Attia, contended that nutritional science was so inconsistent because it was so expensive to do right. With one of the objectives of elevating an additional $190 million, they wanted to fund science that would help cut the prevalence of obesity in the US by more than half–and diabetes by 75 percent–by 2025.

Rehabilitating the entire field of nutrition research was always a long shot. But six years in, NuSI is nowhere near achieving its lofty ambitions. In reality, the once-flush organization is broke, president-less, and all but gone. It’s been three years because it last tweeted, two years since it’s had a real office; today NuSI consists of two part-time employees and an unpaid volunteer hanging around while Taubes tries to conjure two seconds act.

Because while he’s almost out of fund, Taubes was still not out of notions. This time, though, that might not be enough.

When Taubes and Attia first hatched their “Manhattan Project for nutrition, ” they planned to work on it nighttimes and weekends, crowdsourcing monies from the low-carb corners of the internet. They didn’t think it would be too difficult; between a 2002 New York Times cover story titled “What If It &# x27; s All Been a Big Fat Lie ?” and his best-selling book Good Calories, Bad Calories , Taubes had become the country’s anti-sugar agitator-in-chief. Then, in 2011, Taubes received an email from a former natural gas merchant named John Arnold who wanted to help.

In May 2012, merely weeks after announcing his and his wife’s new charity aimed at reforming iffy the matter of science, the John and Laura Arnold Foundation dedicated NuSI a $4.7 million seed to be given to do nutrition research right. In 2013 they followed that up with an additional $35.5 million commitment over five years, attaining them NuSI’s lead funder.

At the heart of their mission was the decades-old question of whether all calories are, in fact, created equal. The mainstream position is that it’s simply an excess of calories that makes people fat–no matter whether those calories come from a bagel or a steak or a bowl of broccoli. Taubes and Attia subscribe to a developing minority stance, dubbed the carbohydrate/ insulin or C/ I hypothesis, that contends obesity is caused by an excess of insulin driving energy into fat storages. In other terms, sugar makes people fat.

Taubes and Attia believed those questions necessity a more streamlined research approach to get real answers. So they formed NuSI to funnel fund into a rigorous new decide of studies, while leaving scientists with the experimental liberty that would shield their results from bias.

With the Arnold money in hand, Taubes and Attia started recruiting top researchers in 2012 to conduct four initial examines. They purposefully brought on people who disagreed with them, like Kevin Hall, a senior examiner at the NIH’s National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, whose mathematical models predicted that a low-carb, low-insulin diet would have only a tiny impact on calorie-burning. He would head up one of NuSI’s first studies, dubbed the Energy Balance Consortium.

The EBC’s pilot project would lock 17 overweight humen inside metabolic wards for two months, feeding them precisely devised banquets and pricking and prodding to ascertain what happened to their bodies on a low-carb diet. If it built them burn calories faster, a follow-up survey would do the same exams on a bigger group of people. If the effects was minimal, researchers would then test the effect of low-carb diets on hunger.

Hall was skeptical they would find anything to support the carbohydrate/ insulin hypothesis. But he was assured by the terms of the contract; NuSI would have no control over the pilot study’s intend, procedure, or reporting. He could build the study he wanted.

At first, things ran according to scheme. The EBC researchers met with NuSI quarterly to finalise the study’s designing and clinical procedures. NuSI signed a consulting agreement with Dr. Jeff Volek–author of the book The Art and Science of Low Carbohydrate Living — to generate the diets and menus.

By August 2014, the EBC researchers had preliminary results on their 17 volunteers: The data presented “no significant difference” in energy expending. That didn’t intend it was a failure; to the researchers, they had succeeded in checking the method used before using it in an even bigger, longer investigate. “We had to work out these rather complex logistics of get common meat sources distributed among many establishments, ” tells Rudolph Leibel, one of the consortium scientists working on the pilot at Columbia. “It looked like something the Allies would have organized for all the landings on D-Day.”

But when Hall presented the pilot’s results in person to representatives from NuSI at a session in Bethesda in September, “theyre not” so rosy-eyed. NuSI wanted to see the data, and it began furnishing extensive critiques once they had it.

Taubes in particular had issues with many of the study’s designings, which fed participants a “standard American diet” for four weeks before switching them to an extremely low-carb, or ketogenic, regimen with the same sum of calories. It was supposed to get them to a stable weight, or energy balance, to establish a baseline before going keto. But the subjects all lost weight even before they started cutting out carbs. Taubes contended that was because the standard diet didn’t have enough refined sugary liquors to depict average American consumption.

“From my perspective, the pilot was a failing for several reasons, ” Taubes says. “First, it failed to get people in energy balance in the run-in period, and that was a necessary condition to interpret the findings.” In addition, he points out, the design didn’t include a group of non-dieters, and non-randomized trials do not allows users firm conclusions about causality, circumstances that everyone in the group knew going in. In his eyes, all the pilot told them was that their technique was flawed. “If this was an animal learn, they’d have thrown them out, ” he tells. “Euthanized them and started over.”

But NuSI had already invested$ 5 million of the Arnold’s money, and everyone was eager to get to the second phase of such studies. As they worked out the details through 2015, the relationship between EBC and NuSI continued to fray. “There was not a real squad, ” tells Eric Ravussin, EBC’s co-principal investigator and director of Pennington’s Nutrition Obesity Research Center. “As scientists we were in agreement over the pilot results and the new protocols, but NuSI had some concerns. It eventually simply became us versus them.”

According to Hall and Ravussin, NuSI began to push back, in a way that they seemed jeopardized their ability to do good science. In April, the EBC researchers mailed NuSI an email requesting to re-establish their academic freedom.

Emily Waite

As 2015 turned into 2016, the relationship between the EBC researchers, NuSI, and the Arnold Foundation degenerated so far. At the end of December, Attia softly resigned from the organization. Sources close to him say he was unhappy has become a full-time fund-raiser; he wanted to get back to research.

NuSI scrambled to fill Attia’s position as chairwoman, first with Christopher Ochner, a psychiatrist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and a few months later with Julie Eckstrand, NuSI’s then-director of clinical procedures, who has since left. At the beginning of 2016, NuSI’s yearly contract with the Arnold Foundation was replaced by a series of three-month bridge contracts, with marching orders to downsize. The team of 15 full-time employees and major contractors diminish to a skeleton crew that could handle the three remaining analyzes. NuSI shuttered its San Diego headquarters and became a virtual organization.

Things came to a head at a session in January 2016. In front of John Arnold, NuSI directors Taubes and Mark Friedman openly quarreled with Hall and his colleagues about what was really necessary to run a good study. Hall had had enough. At the end of the fulfill he stepped down from his role with the EBC, citing changing expectations about the structure and practice of the NuSI collaboration.

As the remaining researchers continued to clash with NuSI over the summer about the second phase, the pilot makes were finally written in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in July. They received a lot of media attention, in no small component because Hall said the pilot, along with another analyse he’d conducted previously, “basically falsify” the hypothesi that sugar makes people fat. By the end of the summer, the Arnold Foundation had decided not to fund the second phase of the study.

After that, NuSI stopped get checks from the Arnolds. But the foundation didn’t stop funding research into the carbohydrate/ insulin question. That fall they opened their search to the wider world, putting out a call for proposals for “rigorous research projects that will assess the role that carbohydrate and/ or macronutrients play in metabolic responses and fat accumulation.”

The Arnold Foundation declined to respond to specific questions about how it came to end its relationship with NuSI about $14 million short its commitment. A representative emailed the following statement: “This research was designed to answer scientific questions in the fields of nutrition and obesity. While the foundation no longer immediately supports NuSI initiatives, we continue to fund work in the field of nutrition science and remain open to further investments in this area. The NuSI project was a worthwhile endeavour and remains an important health-related issue for Americans today.”

It’s still too soon to assess what NuSI has added to the nutrition science canon. Outcomes from the two outstanding NuSI-backed learns are due later this year. The fourth and largest one, carried out within Stanford, randomized 600 overweight-to-obese topics into low-fat versus low-carb diets for a year and look back whether or not their weight loss could be explained by their metabolism or their DNA. Published this February in JAMA , such studies determined no differences between the two diets and no meaningful relationship between weight loss and insulin secretion. The most significant finding was that it’s hard to stick to a diet for a whole year.

Obesity docs like Yoni Freedhoff, a prof of family medicine at the University of Ottawa, aren’t amazed that NuSI hasn’t sparked an epistemological revolution. “From the outset, their approach was simply that knowledge will be enough to drive behavior, ” mentions Freedhoff, who has argued that efforts to prove one diet is better than another do a disservice to patients by connoting there’s only one right way to lose weight. He’d love to see research dollars be spent instead on examining how to improve adherence to different feeing strategies.

Taubes tells the fund-raising trip to Zurich went well, though he won’t share specifics. It could just be the plane slowdown, or it was possible to the mental onu of having to sing for his supper, but Taubes sounds tired. “I say this to my spouse all the time:’ Maybe I’m a quack.’ All quacks are sure they’re right. Isn’t that the defining characteristic of a quack? But the fact is that we funded four investigates, and the three randomized trials were highly successful operationally. One of these has been published in a top journal with interesting results, and I remain hopeful that we will soon see if the last two analyzes will move some needles. Our sentences have gotten us this far, and despite some disappointments, these questions still seem vitally important to test.”

Taubes was confident that NuSI is just evolving into something a bit more humble. Between its current coffers and the agreements he’s working on, he belief NuSI can stay afloat for several years, eventually supporting more outside research, though on a much more modest scale. He’s get minds about instituting a scientific oversight committee to make sure everyone agrees on methods and statistical investigates from the outset.

But he’s also starting to think about how to go back to the life he had before NuSI, the life of a columnist. He’s get more articles and volumes he still wants to write , not exclusively about carbohydrate. But it’s tricky. “I know I clearly have conflicts that other journalists only don’t have, and that’s a tightrope I haven’t figured out how to walk yet, ” Taubes tells. “This nutrition science crusade–right or wrong–expands easily to fill all the time in my life that can be allotted to work. So I’m going to figure out how to partition time better in the future.”

In between flights and seminar dinners, he’s been checking his email for notes on an upcoming article about a new kind of observational study that uses genetic variation to simulate a randomized control trial. While the story isn’t strictly related to nutritional science, Taubes currently has the kind of conflicts of interest that make publications wary. He’s working with a new editor and a new outlet after his old editor at Science wouldn’t touch it. Taubes founded NuSI to support objective science; now, it &# x27; s his own objectivity he has to defend.

More Great WIRED Stories

Read more: https :// www.wired.com/ story/ how-a-dollar4 0-million-nutrition-science-crusade-fell-apart /

Epileptic boy gets cannabis oil back

Media playback is unsupported on your machine

Media captionCharlotte Caldwell tells “history has been made” after the Home office let her son to use cannabis oil

A boy with severe epilepsy has been given back medicinal cannabis petroleum that was confiscated from his mother at customs, the home secretary has said.

Billy Caldwell, 12, received the petroleum after physicians made clear it was a “medical emergency”, Sajid Javid said.

Billy’s mother, Charlotte Caldwell, from County Tyrone, said they had “achieved the impossible” but called for the petroleum to be freely available.

Billy began utilizing cannabis petroleum in 2016 to control his seizures.

The cannabis oil, which contains a substance called Tetrahydrocannabinol( THC ), is illegal in the UK but available elsewhere.

Puerto Rico Hurricane Death Toll 70 Times Higher Than Official Government Count, Harvard Study Estimates

At least 4,645 people died in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria stimulated landfall last autumn, more than 70 times higher than the official government counting, according to a new Harvard study. The learn, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, mentions the government’s official demise counting is much too low.

“Our results indicate that the official fatality count of 64 is a substantial underestimate of the real onu of mortality after Hurricane Maria, ” wrote the researchers.

Earlier this year, researchers surveyed 3,299 randomly selected households( of more than 1.1 million) across the US territory about displacement, infrastructure loss, and causes of death. Between September 20 and December 2018, one-third of deaths could be attributed to “delayed or interrupted healthcare”, including an inability to access drug, equipment necessity energy, shut facilities, and absent doctors. It’s unclear how many of those could have been prevented had access to adequate care been provided.

On average, households went 84 days without electricity, 68 without sea, and 41 without telephone coverage during those months. The area also reported “substantial population displacement”- 2.8 percent of those sampled reporting having to leave their home because of the hurricane.

Gathering data on Puerto Rico’s death counts has been a contentious and difficult task. In Puerto Rico, every disaster-related death must be confirmed by the Institute of Forensic Science by bringing the body to San Juan or having a medical examiner travel to verify the fatality. This causes a delay in demise credentials as well as an increase in indirect deaths per worsening conditions that may not be captured.

“These numbers will serve as an important independent comparison to official statistics from death-registry data, which are currently being re-evaluated, and underscore the disregard of the U.S. government to the frail infrastructure of Puerto Rico, ” the research team wrote.

Category 4 Hurricane Maria attained landfall near Yabucoa, Puerto Rico, around 6:15 a.m. EDT on September 20, 2017, knocking out radar on small island developing just before Maria stimulated landfall. CIRA

The Category 4 hurricane made landfall on September 20, 2017, following the extermination of Hurricane Irma two weeks earlier, further interrupting the water supply, electricity , telecommunications, and access to medical care. Thousands were displaced from their homes, seeking shelter across the territory and in the two sides of the strait US. Following the disaster, the Trump administration received criticism for its response to the growing humanitarian crisis.

In December, Puerto Rico’s governor issued a review of the deaths that resulted in an estimate of more than 1,000 in the month following landfall. This study pulls on further data made available in November and December, as well as an expansion of how hurricane-related deaths are defined. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, deaths can be attributed to a tropical cyclone if they are “caused by forces relating to such event, such as flying dust, or if they are caused by unsafe or unhealthy conditions” following the disaster.

Because the survey couldn’t account for people who lived alone and succumbed in accordance with the storm, the total fatality counting could be more than 5,700. Nonetheless, researchers employed a more conservative estimation to address recollection bias and faults innate in self-reported surveys.

The researchers say accurate estimates of deaths, hurts, illness, and displacement following such a disaster are “critical to the immediate response” as well as its preparation of future preparedness and hazard reduction. They have built their data publicly available for additional analyses.

Healthcare disruption is a developing issue following natural disasters and has been observed in the aftermaths of Hurricane Katrina, Superstorm Sandy, and more recently Hurricanes Harvey and Irma. Roosevelt Skerrit/ Wikimedia Commons

Read more: http :// www.iflscience.com/ editors-blog/ puerto-rico-hurricane-death-toll-7 0-times-higher-than-official-government-count-harvard-study-estimates /